naats.gif (2777 bytes)

National Association of Air Traffic Specialists
Aviation Safety is Our Business

NAATS NEWS, October 2000


Table of Contents

  1. From The President

  2. Air Traffic Controllers Compensation Inequity Alert

  3. Pay Bulletin #23

  4. Letter to Hon. John J. "Jimmy" Duncan

  5. NAATS Convention 2000

  6. "Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather" Forum

  7. ATPAC

  8. Health & Safety News

  9. Sure, the North Pole Is Melting. So What?

  10. Tips For A Safe & Happy Halloween

  11. Regional Supplements (Not Yet Available)


NEWSLETTER E-MAIL ADDRESS:

[email protected]


This issue of NAATS News represents a new approach to disseminating the Newsletter - We are providing a Word Formatted version online for downloading and printing:

(Plain DOC version         ZIPped Version)

Please bear with us as we try to work out the bugs. Of course any and all comments are welcome.

-=John - Webmaster=-


From The President

Wally Pike, NAATS President

I regret to inform you that WP Regional Coordinator Henry Oltman died early the morn-ing of October 13th. Henry was a long-time NAATS member and a fine man. Acting Administrator Ward Simpson attended the funeral for NAATS Headquarters and served as a pallbearer. His wife Diane survives Henry. Our thoughts and prayers are with her during this trying time. 

I want to thank all of you for your efforts in our congressional grassroots letter writing campaign. We've received several initiations to attend fundraisers and we're staying very busy carrying our message to the various representatives. Because of this I've had to cancel some meetings I normally would have attended. The pay negotiations have to have the highest priority on our time and resources. 

One of the items we're working hard on is congressional language to correct the air traf-fic controller compensation inequities within the FAA. Next week will be a key time and we're focusing our efforts toward this goal. NAATS Congressional Representative Hal Gross is continuing to make rapid progress from his bypass surgery and is offering help-ful advise during this time. He advises that he can resume more of his duties in the next few weeks. 

We have a firm date of November 6 for the pay mediation. Our hope is that we'll make significant progress during this meeting. Regardless, we're not depending on the good will of FAA management; we're exploring other options available to secure a fair pay agreement. 

I contacted AOPA President Phil Boyer this week and we will meet in the near future to discuss FSS issues. Phil has given me permission to reproduce, on our web page, the interviews from the October issue of AOPA Pilot magazine conducted with George W. Bush and Al Gore

Wally

Back to Table of Contents


NAATS FSS Air Traffic Controllers Compensation Inequity Alert

October 21, 2000

Congress will be wrapping up the remaining FY 2001 spending bills next week.  NAATS is working with congressional offices to add language to correct the pay inequity that exists between our Flight Service Station air traffic controllers and the 15,000 air traffic controllers and MSS field facility controllers covered by the Air Traffic Control Specialized Compensation Plan.  

Your help is needed! 

To be successful in adding corrective language, we must have the assistance and approval of the Chairman of the Transportation Subcommittee, House Appropriations Committee, Representative Frank Wolf.  Chairman Wolf has taken a leadership role on this issue by requesting that the Inspector General, Department of Transportation, conduct an audit and investigation into the pay parity within the air traffic line of business and the need for additional pay reform in this area.  As important as this action is, however, the requested investigation will take some time to complete and does not include Flight Service.  For immediate relief, we need to convince Chairman Wolf to take the lead again, by requesting that language be inserted into one of the remaining spending bills.  

Please email Chairman Wolf at [email protected] and thank him for his leadership in seeking to address this problem.  Ask Chairman Wolf to correct the pay inequity for Flight Service Station air traffic controllers before the Congress adjourns next week and ask that he include our amended NAATS language into an existing appropriations bill. 

Yesterday NAATS and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) sent a joint letter to the congressional authorizers and appropriators requesting congressional action to correct the ATC compensation inequities. This letter will be posted to our website. We will continue to do everything we can from here but we need your help. Congressional representatives respond to constituents; I ask that you contact your congressional representatives as soon as possible and emphasize the following: 

The effect of the corrective language will be to require the FAA to compensate all air traffic controllers in a comparable manner and will be finalized and distributed to congress Monday.

Listed below are the members of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation with their telephone numbers. Ask for the person handling FAA appropriations. 

Frank Wolf, R-VA 

202-225-5136

Tom DeLay, R-TX

202-225-5951

Ralph Regula, R-OH

202-225-3876

Harold Rogers, R-KY

202-225-4601

Ron Packard, R-CA

202-225-3906

Sonny Callahan, R-AL

202-225-4931

Todd Tiahrt, R-KS

202-225-6216

Robert Aderholt, R-AL

202-225-4876

Kay Granger, R-TX

202-225-5071

Martin Sabo, D-MN

202-225-4755

John Olver, D-MA

202-225-5335

Ed Pastor, D-AZ

202-225-4065

Carolyn Kilpatrick, D-MI

202-225-2261

Jose Serrano, D-NY

202-225-4361

Senate Appropriations Transportation Subcommittee members:

Richard Shelby, R-AL

202-224-5744

Pete Domenici, R-NM

202-224-6621

Arlen Specter, R-PA

202-224-4254

Christopher Bond, R-MO

202-224-5721

Slade Gorton, R-WA

202-224-3441

Robert Bennett, R-UT

202-224-5444

Ben Campbell, R-CO

202-224-5852

Frank Lautenberg, D-NJ

202-224-4744

Robert Byrd, D-WV

202-224-3954

Barbara Mikulski, D-MD

202-224-4654

Harry Reid, D-NV

202-224-3542

Herbert Kohl, D-WI

202-224-5653

Patty Murray, D-WA

202-224-2621

Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday of next week will be crucial days for us. I thank you in advance for your help.

Wally

Back to Table of Contents


Pay Bulletin #23 

10/26/00

From
Don McLennan

In the last bulletin we discussed the lack of clarity surrounding the issue of when members say they favor one system over another and what that really means. Compensation for our bargaining unit has evolved to a point where it is more complicated than may be captured by the expression "I favor one system over another". This has, unfortunately, become simplistic to the point of not saying anything really very meaningful. There is so much to talk about; from reclassification and work rules to the ATC pay levels, the Core Compensation System, and, even I suppose, to wanting to remain the same. It is sufficiently complicated that when I hear someone say what they think they want I generally have about a dozen clarifying questions. For example, there are those that say "Just get me the best deal".

I feel like someone is sharing some of his or her feelings that this issue has become way too complex. It has so many facets and such a great deal of unknowns I think members are sharing their frustrations and are essentially saying, "let those people who have developed compensation reform provide the necessary guidance to the membership on what and why this is the "best deal". However, this worries me because we must all be fully informed before we vote to accept, or reject, anything developed in negotiations with the FAA.

This "best deal" seems to have about four facets. The first is reclassification. Do we want to embrace those precepts or reject them and remain the same? This is potentially a very divisive issue, especially if there is pay surrounding the levels and higher level facilities are paid at a higher rate than lower level facilities. Those in smaller facilities believe it is unfair and unsubstantiated that higher level facilities are truly deserving of greater pay. Likewise, the opposite is true for those facilities with a higher traffic count, they are tired and resentful of being paid at lower level facility pay. Secondly, are our work rules that have already been Tentatively Agreed Upon but are being held hostage by our inability to agree on a pay plan. Thirdly, what is necessary for NAATS to become converted into "ATC" like pay levels, and at what levels, and would that be a good deal for all of us? Also, if we go down the NATCA road, if in a smaller facility will you be treated unfairly as I have heard happened in the other bargaining unit? Finally, the Core System must be thoroughly reviewed to insure we know this may really be in our best interest if other options become closed to us. Each of these four facets is as important as the other is.

All of these are fair questions that deserve considerable and thoughtful reflection. We need to try and guard against being closed-minded to the point that we think we know what is best for everyone else, especially if we believe it only because that is what we believe is best for us. It is imperative, to act as a Union, that we recognize the breath, differences and dissimilar situations so many of us are in. At this point it would be greatly counterproductive, in my view, to take the "short sighted" view that what "is best for me is best for everyone". Let's make sure, in the final hour, we live up to the beliefs we all have in common and act as a Union and demonstrate nothing less than complete understanding and compassion for our fellow workers. Let's make sure we all take the high road. One sorely needed within this Agency. We will be better for it in the end.

Back to Table of Contents


Letter to Hon. John J. "Jimmy" Duncan

Charles E. Kuenen, Ranch Murietta AFSS

NOTE: The following is the body of a letter sent by Chuck Kuenen to several Congres-sional Representatives. I have also included the informational article that accompanied it. Copies of this letter were also sent to Representatives John Doolittle, Gary G. Miller, Steven T. Kuykendall, Juanita Millender-McDonald, Ellen O. Tauscher, and Bob Filner.

Dear Representative Duncan:

I work as an Air Traffic Control Specialist (Station) at Rancho Murietta Automated Flight Service Station (AFSS). On behalf of the professional men and women in Flight Serv-ice, many of who reside in your district, I am writing to ask your support to insist that the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) recognize us as invaluable employees and that the FAA work with the federal mediator during impasse meetings to agree to a fair labor contract and an equitable pay system.

It seems that the FAA doesn't value us as members of the air traffic control team and has no intention of entertaining any meaningful discussion on reclassification. Quite the contrary, the FAA only knows one tune, 5.5% over 5 years, all accomplished through workforce attrition and basically all of it paid in the last two years; this is unacceptable. Our counterparts in the enroute and terminal options have been enjoying a substantial pay-raise resulting from a new pay system, not Core Compensation, and a new labor contract of over a year.

The FAA's network of Flight Service Stations has existed for 55 years, serving general aviation, air carriers, and the military with weather briefings, flight planning, search and rescue, in-flight communications, and emergency services. Over the past 15 years, more than 350 stations were consolidated into 61 automated facilities. This in turn has created a demand for higher productivity to avoid any adverse impact on aviation safety. Further cuts to existing automated facilities or reduction in services will mean aviation safety will ultimately suffer.

General Aviation (GA) has clearly expressed their desire to maintain and modernize Flight Service through two distinct forums, the General Aviation Weather Joint Safety Analysis Team and the General Aviation User's Summit. In their collective opinion, Flight Service is essential if they are to successfully improve flight safety and reduce accidents (weather is the second largest factor in GA accidents). Representatives from the Aircraft Owners and Pilot's Association (AOPA); National Business Aviation Asso-ciation (NBAA); Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA); the Ninety-Nines; General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA); and Small Aircraft Manufacturers Associa-tion (SAMA), have made specific recommendations that would strengthen the Agency's ability to meet immediate and future customer needs as part of Vice-President Gore's "Safer Skies" initiative.

Flight Service Stations provide valuable safety related services to pilots. General avia-tion aircraft fly over half the air miles flown and they service 100 per cent of the nation's airports. In addition, 70 per cent of GA activity is business related which means their success is extremely important to our economy. Instead of seeking ways to eliminate the AFSS network, the FAA should recognize General Aviation's desires to strengthen Flight Service and work with union representative (National Association of Air Traffic Specialists/NAATS) to achieve both a fair labor contract and a new pay system.

Thank you for your continued support. On behalf of the Flight Service Specialists, I wish to invite you or any members of your staff to visit the local automated facility and I would be more than happy to arrange it for you. Attached is a paper describing our plight with the FAA in a little more detail.


The Case of the Disappearing Controllers

                                                       By Hal Gross1 

In 1997, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) completed its long-planned consolidation, begun in 1981, from 318 down to 61 Automated Flight Service Stations (AFSS) nationally. Grouped into nine geographic regions (see Figure 1), the 61 AFSS, together with 17 non-automated facilities (FSS) -- some of which operate seasonally or part-time, and all of which are scattered around Alaska, comprise the Flight Service, a part of the FAA. The AFSS are small facilities, generally sited away from large population centers. 

Figure 1

Alaska Region *                   

1.      Fairbanks AFSS, AK     
2.      Juneau AFSS, AK     
3.      Kenai AFSS, AK     
A.     Dillingham FSS, AK            
B.     Homer FSS, AK
C.    Ketchikan FSS, AK
D.    Palmer FSS, AK
E.     Sitka FSS, AK
F.     Talkeetna FSS, AK 

*Part time/seasonal FSS not included.

 Central Region

4. Columbia AFSS, MO
5. Columbus AFSS, NE
6. Fort Dodge AFSS, IA 
7. St. Louis AFSS, MO
8. Wichita AFSS, KS 

Eastern Region

9.      Altoona AFSS, PA
10. Buffalo AFSS, NY
11. Elkins AFSS, WV
12. Islip AFSS, NY
13. Leesburg AFSS, VA
14. Millville AFSS, NJ
15. Williamsport AFSS, PA 

Great Lakes Region

16. Cleveland AFSS, OH
17. Dayton AFSS, OH
18. Grand Forks AFSS, ND
19. Green Bay AFSS, WI
20. Huron AFSS, SD
21. Kankakee AFSS, IL
22. Terre Haute AFSS, IN
23. Lansing AFSS, MI
24. Princeton AFSS, MN

New England Region

25. Bangor AFSS, ME
26. Bridgeport AFSS, CT
27. Burlington AFSS, VT

Northwest Mountain Region

28. Boise AFSS, ID
29. Casper AFSS, WY
30. Cedar City AFSS, UT
31. Denver AFSS, CO
32. Great Falls AFSS, MT
33. McMinnville AFSS, OR  
34. Seattle AFSS, WA

Southern Region

35. Anderson AFSS, SC
36. Anniston AFSS, AL
37. Gainesville AFSS, FL
38. Greenwood AFSS, MS
39. Jackson AFSS, TN
40. Louisville AFSS, TN
41. Macon AFSS, GA
42. Miami AFSS, FL
43. Nashville AFSS, TN
44. Raleigh AFSS, NC
45. San Juan AFSS, PR
46. St. Petersburg AFSS, FL       

Southwest Region

47. Albuquerque AFSS, NM
48. Conroe AFSS, TX
49. De Ridder AFSS, LA
50. Fort Worth AFSS, TX
51. Jonesboro AFSS, AR
52. Mc Alester AFSS, OK
53. San Angelo AFSS, TX  

Western Pacific Region

54. Hawthorne AFSS, CA
55. Honolulu AFSS, HA
56. Oakland AFSS, CA
57. Prescott AFSS, AZ
58. Rancho Murietta AFSS, CA
59. Reno AFSS, NV
60. Riverside AFSS, CA
61. San Diego AFSS, CA

Figure 1 

All Flight Service air traffic controllers (GS-2152), in addition to regular controller training, are specifically trained to provide weather-related information to pilots, and to help pilots avoid weather-related hazards, including thunderstorms, turbulence and icing. It takes about three years, under normal conditions, to hire and train a flight service controller to perform these services.  The regular services provided by Flight Service controllers include filing flight plans, preflight and inflight weather briefings, monitoring air navigation aids and providing en route communications with pilots, assisting pilots in distress, providing pilots with various other services, and conducting vital search and rescue missions. While general aviation pilots constitute the usual clientele for these services, commercial air and military pilots can and frequently do use them. 

In February 1972, the National Association of Air Traffic Specialists (NAATS) became and remains the sole union representing the Flight Service controllers. Despite its reservations, NAATS did not oppose consolidation of the Flight Service stations, sharing the FAA�s desire for increased efficiency.  However, NAATS views with increasing alarm the steady decline in the number of working controllers remaining in the Flight Service. Figure 2 depicts the fact that the number of controllers working at Flight Service stations has dropped steadily in every year but one since 1981, and is now well-below the 2,650 minimum which both NAATS and the FAA consider safe. 

Of about 2,350 controllers who remain in the Flight Service, between 40 and 50 percent are presently eligible to retire.  NAATS estimates that a full 80 percent of Flight Service controllers will be eligible for retirement by the year 2002. 

Currently, Flight Service controllers are disappearing at the rate of approximately 150 per year. The FAA expects this pace to go on, at least for the next several years. 

Several factors contribute to this growing crisis.  First, the work force is already about 300 controllers below the safe minimum.  Second, replacements are not easily found. Third, both instructors and training slots are severely limited at the FAA Academy, creating a bottleneck limiting the rate at which trainees can receive their mandatory training to become controllers.  Fourth, given the three years needed to train a journeyman controller, about 450 trainees must be in the pipeline just to offset annual attrition.  At least 300 more must be hired and trained over the same period to restore safety to the system. Yet, the FAA has hired virtually no controllers into the Flight Service in the last ten years. 

Given the importance and complexity of this problem, one would expect the FAA to have some solution in mind. Yet, to date the FAA has not presented a plan - credible or not - to address even the anticipated loss of experienced senior controllers, as retirements occur.  Clearly, the Flight Service will lose labor, ability, institutional knowledge and experience as senior controllers retire, even if the numbers are replaced. The shortage of controllers is now acute.  

While many controllers leave the ranks to avoid job-related stress or to take earned retirement -- normal attrition -- others are transferred into management or supervisory positions, or temporarily detailed into non-controller positions.  FAA management has not recognized the effects of steadily diminishing the controller work force below acceptable minimums. 

The steady shrinkage in the number of Flight Service controllers has an obvious impact on controller morale.  As the Flight Service system depends on fewer and fewer controllers to do the same jobs, the burdens assigned to those who remain become greater, and the stress of this employment increases. Meanwhile, the opportunity to take ordinary paid leave or time off diminishes. Over time, these factors increase the possibility of errors of judgment in this stress-filled and exacting occupation, where an error of judgment can quickly lead to fatalities, sometimes counted in the hundreds.  As the number of Flight Service controllers has decreased, the number of general aviation and commercial aviation flights has steadily increased, multiplying the pressures, the number of judgments required by the controllers who remain on the job, and the opportunity for accidents to happen.  

Figure 2

Number of flight service controllers

                  On December 31 of:   Number of Flight Service Controllers:

               1981            3,576

               1982            3,525

               1983            3,508

               1984            3,499

               1985 Not available

               1986 Not available

               1987            3,119

               1988            3,019

               1989            3,041

               1990            3,037

               1991            3,030

               1992            3,006

               1993            2,883

               1994            2,659

               1995            2,579

   Number of flight service controllers

                  On December 31 of:   Number of Flight Service Controllers:

               1996            2,456

               1997            2,368

Figure 2

Understaffing at many facilities limits the ability of the FAA�s Flight Service System to perform its task. Initially, controllers faced with more pilot calls than a facility can immediately handle must let calls back up. Inevitably, this results in fewer pilots getting necessary information, as some pilots run out of patience, and simply hang up. San Angelo, Texas, a medium-sized facility with twelve fewer controllers than the acceptable minimum, reports that it sometimes loses 12 calls per hour, for example. 

As the problem becomes more acute, pilots� calls are passed along to another facility, with lower demand. Because the "traffic" depends heavily on local weather, the level of traffic may change abruptly, or the facility to which calls are off-loaded may be at considerable distance from the original facility. The result is that the weather information supplied may be less timely, or less detailed than that from the local facility initially contacted. The opportunities for miscommunication and ambiguities increase when the pilot is in one area and the controller is in another. 

In one August 1996 instance, which the FAA classifies as an "operational deviation", a controller at the Lansing, Michigan AFSS was assigned to take a pilot briefing call. The pilot requested clearance to fly to Cape Girardeau, Missouri, "departing Cheboygan."  The controller was not informed that the pilot call originated outside the Lansing, Michigan, flight plan area, which includes the Cheboygan, Michigan airport, and proceeded to brief accordingly.  However, the pilot, unaware that his call had been transferred to Lansing, Michigan, was located at the Sheboygan, Wisconsin, airport, in the flight plan area of the Green Bay, Wisconsin, AFSS. Fortunately, the ambiguity was resolved before an accident could occur. 

The controller involved says, "Transferring pilot briefing calls to another AFSS is dangerous. If it continues, it will eventually cause the deaths of pilots and passengers." 

Because the FAA has let the shortage of Flight Service controllers build for so long, understaffing occurs in every region of the country.  Figure 3 shows the understaffing of controllers on a station-by-station and regional basis. 

Figure 3

Shortage of Flight Service Air Traffic Controllers by Facility,
as of June 2, 1998:

Region Facility and Location

Current Staffing

Minimum Needed

Shortage

Alaska *

193

201

8

1. Fairbanks AFSS

64

66

2

2. Juneau AFSS

24

27

3

3. Kenai AFSS

86

88

2

     A. Homer FSS

4

4

0

     B. Ketchikan FSS

8

8

0

     C. Palmer FSS

2

2

0

     D. Sitka FSS 

2

4

2

     E. Talkeetna FSS

3

2

-1

*part-time/seasonal FSS not shown

Central

164

187

23

4. Columbia AFSS, MO

48

52

4

5. Columbus AFSS, NE

22

26

4

6. Fort Dodge AFSS, IA

31

36

5

7. St. Louis AFSS, MO

34

37

3

8. Wichita AFSS, KS

29

36

7

Eastern

285

311

26

9. Altoona AFSS, PA

48

48

0

10. Buffalo AFSS, NY

30

33

3

11. Elkins AFSS, WV

28

31

3

12. Islip AFSS, NY

39

44

5

13. Leesburg AFSS, VA

59

63

4

14. Millville AFSS, NJ

35

44

9

15. Williamsport AFSS, PA

46

48

2

Great Lakes

389

439

50

16. Cleveland AFSS, OH

42 

58

16

17. Dayton AFSS, OH

41

43

2

18. Grand Forks AFSS, ND

26

26

0

19. Green Bay AFSS, WI

50

52

2

20. Huron AFSS, SD

22

22

0

21. Kanakee AFSS, IL

52

60

8

22. Lansing AFSS, MI

56

68

12

23. Princeton AFSS, MN

52

54

2

24. Terre Haute AFSS, IN

48

56

8

New England

105

129

24

25. Bangor AFSS, ME

28

32

4

26. Bridgeport AFSS, CT 

47

61

14

27. Burlington AFSS, VT

30

36

6

Northwest Mountain

227

245

18

28. Boise AFSS, ID

24

24

0

29. Casper AFSS, WY 

23

24

1

30. Cedar City AFSS, UT

29

32

3

31. Denver AFSS, CO

46

51

5

32. Great Falls AFSS, MT

31

21

-10

33. Mc Minnville AFSS, OR 

25

35

10

34. Seattle AFSS, WA

49

58

9

Southern

424

534

90

35. Anderson AFSS, SC

38

46

8

36. Anniston AFSS, AL

35

42

7

37. Gainesville AFSS, FL

38

50

12

38. Greenwood AFSS, MS

19

26

7

39. Jackson AFSS, TN

23

28

5

40. Louisville AFSS, KY

24

32

8

41. Macon AFSS, GA

43

50

7

42. Miami AFSS, FL

57

65

8

43. Nashville AFSS, TN

30

40

10

44. Raleigh AFSS, NC

40

50

10

45. San Juan AFSS, PR

14

24

10

46. St. Petersburg AFSS, FL

63

68

5

Southwest

282

319

37

47. Albuquerque AFSS, NM

40

40

0

48. Conroe AFSS, TX 

39

45

6

49. De Ridder AFSS, LA

25

35

10

50. Fort Worth AFSS, TX

70

72

2

51. Jonesboro AFSS, AR

33 

37

4

52. Mc Alester AFSS, OK

39

42

3

53. San Angelo AFSS, TX

36

48

12

Western Pacific

277

295

18

54. Hawthorne AFSS, CA

35

38

3

55. Honolulu AFSS, HI

19

23

4

56. Oakland AFSS, CA

40

47

7

57. Prescott AFSS, AZ

46

48

2

58. Rancho Murieta AFSS, CA

37

37

0

59. Reno AFSS, NV

30

30

0

60. Riverside AFSS, CA

39

41

2

61. San Diego AFSS, CA

31

31

0

Current Staffing

Minimum Needed

Shortage

TOTALS

2,346

2,660 

314

Figure 3 

The FAA has not only failed to deal with this growing problem, but it has also attempted to mask its existence.  The number of Flight Service controllers is seldom shown separately in FAA statistics.  Rather, controllers are lumped in with managers, supervisors, administrative personnel, persons on detail or extended leave, and others to produce a Flight Service total.  By counting this large number of people as Flight Service personnel, the FAA masks the considerable drop in the number of controllers since 1981, and the rate at which controller numbers have declined in comparison with supervisory and administrative personnel.  Figure. 4 differentiates controllers from non-controllers among Flight Service personnel between 1981 and 1995, to show how nearly all reductions in Flight Service personnel over the same period have been controllers. 

Figure 4

FAA Flight Service Station Staffing 1981 ? 1995 (on December 31)

Year:

Controllers (GS-2152)

Supervisory, Manager, Other Personnel

Totals

81

3576

929

4505

82

3525

797

4322

83

3508

836

4344

84

3499

824

4323

85*

*

*

4423

86*

*

*

4361

87

3199

1098

4217

88

3019

1113

4132

89

3041

1075

4116

90

3037

1113

4150

91

3030

1137

4167

92

3006

1111 

4117

93

2883

1076

3959

94

2659

951

3610

95

2579

923

3502

Change 81-95

(997) 

(6)

(1003)

*No job classification data available for these two years.

Figure 4 

In its budget request for this year, the Department of Transportation seeks funding for 90 fewer Flight Service controllers for FY 2000. The Flight Service controller workforce, through attrition, is disappearing at an alarming rate. 

The problems that the FAA faces are not new. The Agency began operation on December 31, 1958, replacing the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA). By that time, the CAA had been understaffed and under-funded for over 20 years.  The FAA was functioning without adequate radar surveillance technology, and was being overwhelmed by rapid increases in air traffic. Congressional interest was elsewhere, until a United Airlines flight and a TWA Super Constellation collided over the Grand Canyon, killing more than 120 people on the two planes. Investigation revealed that the CAA did not have enough airways, airspace or controllers to offer positive separation to all aircraft flying across the country. The CAA claimed inability to purchase sufficient radar navigation aids or hire sufficient controllers, because of lack of funds. After the accident investigation was completed, the CAA requested and Congress appropriated $250 million to upgrade the airway system, double available navigation aids, open 40 new control towers, and hire 1,400 additional controllers. 

In the spring of 1958, an Air Force jet collided with a United Air Lines DC-7 near Las Vegas, killing 47. Less than a month later, an Air National Guard jet collided with a Capital Airlines turboprop, killing 12. 

While the FAA was in the process of getting organized, on December 16, 1960, a United DC-8 and a TWA Super Constellation collided over New York City, killing 128 on the two planes and eight on the ground. President Kennedy, in March 1961, established the Project Beacon task force to study the air traffic control system and recommend improvements.  

The task force found that the FAA had many projects in development, with no overall direction or coordination to guide them. Much of the agency�s research was based on a report issued 20 years earlier, and some research and development was focusing on technically advanced equipment, while little work was being done on short-range problems that needed immediate attention. The task force recommended the development of what became the flight data processing (FDP) system. It also recommended a computer-driven display system to identify aircraft, altitude and airspeed directly on the radarscope.  

The FAA eventually responded to Project Beacon�s recommendations, but at a much slower pace than the task force had recommended. In 1968, the union representing tower controllers (PATCO) charged the FAA with unnecessarily delaying the installation of sufficient air traffic control equipment and with not hiring enough new air traffic controllers to operate the nation�s air traffic control system. In 1968, PATCO controllers organized a strict "work to the rule" slowdown, and in 1970 a controller sickout, in which 2,000 controllers participated. As a result, the FAA requested and Congress appropriated additional funds to accelerate the installation of many of the automated systems recommended by the Project Beacon task force. Even so, the FAA remained years behind the planned acquisition schedule. 

The air traffic control problems of the late 1960�s and early 1970�s sound remarkably like the problems Flight Service controllers face in the late 1990�s: low morale inspired by poor FAA management, understaffing, and under-funding.  New technology has come along, but the FAA still must be compelled by the Congress to acquire it, reluctantly and always years after it is available, as it nears obsolescence. The FAA continues to blame Congress for not appropriating sufficient funds, but usually has not requested the funds it needs. Controllers are compelled to work with obsolescent equipment, as an understaffed workforce, because of poor FAA planning and management. 

The FAA is not listening or concerned. Unfortunately, NAATS must turn its efforts to gaining the attention of Congress and user groups toward these obvious problems. The necessary solutions need to be quickly implemented including hiring new personnel, on a steady and sustained basis, into the Flight Service option.

# # # 

1The writer is the Legislative Representative of the National Association of Air Traffic Specialists (NAATS). Comments on this article may be sent to President Wally Pike, at           NAATS, 11303 Amherst Avenue, Suite 4, Wheaton, MD 20902. 

2 See Nolan, Michael S., Fundamentals of Air Traffic Control, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1990, p. 25 ff.

Back to Table of Contents


NAATS Convention 2000

NAATS

CONVENTION

2000

SAN DIEGO, CA

NOV. 15-16, 2000

The Handlery
Hotel & Resort

FACREP TRAINING

NOV. 14TH 

Reservations: 619-298-0511/800-676-6567 (M-F 8-5)
Refer to NAATS meeting for special group rate of $89.00
By Oct 12, 2000

Back to Table of Contents


"Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather" Forum

Larry Burdick, Public Relations Team Chair

The following is a synopsis of the meeting:

Paul Fiduccia, President - Small Aircraft Manufacturer's Association (SAMA) kept a task sheet to track progress of action items.

NAATS committed to the following three (3) tasks:
#2. What weather products do we still use / don't use? 
#5. ASOS failures and reporting procedures for flight service. 
#9. PIREP distribution practices -- are all PIREP(s) entered into the system by FSS controllers / or getting to FSS from tower/center? 

Problems Identified by NAATS:
1. Aviation weather product improvements are not getting to flight service. Many of the FAA's weather R&D and advanced systems are going into only towers and centers, not flight service. 
2. Great technology is available for weather but instead of talk, we need action from the FAA. Some systems or products excluded from flight service are: lightning data, CCFP, WARP, ITWIS, NCWF, ADDS, AWRP, WRF, and NCAR research.
3. Infrastructure - flight service needs equipment to allow access to data. 
4. Pilots need better training from FAA on weather. [User groups emphasized this need.] 
5. For ASOS/AWOS pilots want video imaging of the sky like what is available in Alaska. [User groups emphasized this need.] 

We had personal dialogue with AOPA on ASOS problems or limitations -

� Low clouds not directly over the site are missed. 
� Approaching fog banks / clouds are not detected. 
� Mountain obscurations are not determined.
� Sector visibility is not available. 
� Erroneous reports on visibility restrictions can be either better or worse than actual weather. 
� No determination of "thin" clouds to allow VFR operations. [This item to be followed up with Melissa Bailey, (Vice President - Air traffic Services - AOPA).]

Two solutions offered by NAATS:
1. Flight service could assist in reporting ASOS/AWOS outages, if procedures are worked out by FAA & NAATS.
2. Let flight service facilities test new weather technologies for feedback on usability, problems to correct, customer (pilot) suggestions/comments and op-erational deployment potential.

I have been in touch with Ward Simpson about a Navy project in southern California.

Back to Table of Contents


AIR TRAFFIC PROCEDURES ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Andrea Chay, NAATS Representative

ATPAC 101 commenced Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2000 in the Bessie Coleman Conference Center at FAA headquarters. Items discussed that concern us were NOTAM distribu-tion, and entry and dissemination of PIREPS.

100th Meeting of ATPAC

Jeff Griffith, ATP-1 visited and congratulated us on 100 meetings of ATPAC. We have been around longer than most of the programs that get started (and ended!) within FAA. Among things he discussed was new flight plan formatting. In joint meetings with Canada, they will be discussing making our flight plans compatible with Canada and Mexico. This will make data transfer and radar information transfer automatic. Now this must be coordinated manually. Their next meeting is Nov. 7, 2000, and they hope to automate the flight plans transfer by summer of 2001. MAPCOG, the group handling the reformatting of flight plans among other things is still meeting quarterly, and Donna Holmes is on this committee for NAATS. A draft universal flight plan that AOPA had developed in this group previously did not meet the requirements for what was needed for IFR-to-IFR hand-offs. They are trying to preserve the VFR portion, which was OK, and modify what needs to be done to get the IFR transfers to occur automatically.

FY 2001 Budget Items

Jeff said the FSS/GA Summit action plan is being worked. The budget for 2001 has 2 meetings scheduled, with planning for implementing low cost/no cost ideas first. No date has been set yet for the next full summit meeting. He stated the purpose of the FSS Renaissance is that we must change the way we do business, and get the cus-tomer to come to us rather than look for alternative methods of getting weather informa-tion. I know that most of us in FSS would heartily agree and wonder why FAA took so long to realize this! FAA plans to hire at least two more specialists in the FSS Division, ATP-300. Jeff mentioned that the local airport advisory test (LAA) now going on at HRO by JBR AFSS (and two other locations which I don't remember), is receiving positive feedback from users and the controllers involved. They are looking at expanding the ISE/SUA program currently in use at FTW AFSS; money will be the main constraint on expanding it everywhere. OASIS is budgeted for $23 million in the next year's budget, and it looks good that we will get the full amount. SEA has OASIS up and running, and while there are still many work-arounds needed, it is functional, i.e. they are able to actually use it! The response from the controllers as a whole is more favorable than not. (I visited SEA AFSS last week.)

NOTAM Distribution

Pete Quinn briefed us on the status of NOTAM distribution. The FAA is committed to changing to ICAO format, and would like to do this by early next year. However, WMSCR, as it is today, is unable to support the increase in data that the ICAO format would generate, and its replacement is not scheduled for 5 to 6 years. They are looking at ways to distribute NOTAMS other than through WMSCR to expedite the transition.

M1FC is also incapable of handling the increased data needed for ICAO. FAA is look-ing at the possibility of a DOD type web page to distribute NOTAMS, but security is still a problem. Also, FAA still has no Internet policy. Overall, the current NOTAM system will be unsupportable by 2002-2003, so FAA does have a time constraint to deal with regarding NOTAM conversion, etc. We will continue to get updates as changes occur.

NOTAM Distribution

The other issue of interest to us is PIREP dissemination. A JSIT (Joint Safety Imple-mentation Team) group is working on the recommendations previously given, and they will be discussed again during the next GA Summit. Some of the ideas previously gen-erated were: a nationwide VHF PIREP broadcast frequency, intranet/internet access through ADDS (Aviation Digital Data Service), a solicited PIREP program where control-lers request PIREPS at specific times and locations, (test to hopefully begin in FY-01), also a way to make it easy for controllers in towers and centers to get the PIREPS to us in FSS for dissemination. Other ideas were to provide FSS controllers with a display of aircraft position overlaid with weather graphics and enable general aviation access to airline PIREP information (ACARS or e-PIREPS). We will get further updates in January.

That's about it for this ATPAC. If you have any concerns or ideas on procedures that can be improved or streamlined, let me know at [email protected]

Back to Table of Contents


Health and Safety News

Suzanne M. Pellosmaa, NAATS OSH REP 

Hazard Communication Program
Each agency is required by law to have a written hazard communication program because each employee has a RIGHT-TO-KNOW about their exposure to hazardous chemicals at their workplace.  OSHA's expanded standard (29CFR1910.1200) requires that all employees be informed and trained.  In the program all hazardous chemicals used in your facility should be listed.

Common chemicals used include copier supplies such as toner and developer.  Since toner is found in most of our automated flight service stations, there should be a hazard communication program at each facility.  The Great Lakes Region, Airways Facility Division, is currently completing a hazard communication program which should be available to the other lines of business (LOB), remember each LOB is responsible for their OSH program, and yes that does include Air Traffic!!  Acquire a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) on every hazardous chemical known to be present in your workplace.  The vendor selling the product will supply you with this sheet.  OSHA requires that these MSDS's be easily accessible to all employees!  All hazardous chemicals must be labeled.  Employees must be trained regarding the hazard communication program.  Each employee needs to understand the problems of working with these hazardous chemicals, what a MSDS is and where they are stored.  Document your training, this will be very important in the event of an OSHA inspection.  If you are not familiar with an MSDS, it will be briefly described below -- there are eight sections to an MSDS:

         Section I � Manufacturer�s Information (to include name, address, telephone, date prepared & signature)
         Section II � Hazardous Ingredients/Identity Information (common names, OSHA PEL, limits)
         Section III � Physical/Chemical Characteristics (boiling point, vapor pressure/ density, melting point, evaporation rate, etc.)
         Section IV � Fire and Explosion Hazard Data (flash point, flammable limits, etc.)
         Section V � Reactivity Data (stability, Byproducts, polymerization)
         Section VI � Health Hazard Data (route of entry, carcinogenity, signs and symptoms of exposure, medical conditions, emergency and first aid procedures)
         Section VII � Precautions for Safe Handling and Use (steps to be taken in case material is released or spilled, waste disposal method, precautions to be taken in handling and storing)
         Section VIII � Control Measures (respiratory protection, ventilation needed, protective clothing needed, work practices, etc.) 

Emergency Response Planning
All employees need to be trained in policies and procedures.  Fire emergency plans must be established and posted.  Fire extinguisher training must be completed according to the NAATS/FAA contract and should be documented.  Fire extinguishers must be maintained and recharged routinely and a record of this service should be kept on file.  Fire extinguishers need to be located in readily accessible areas and all employees must know their location.  It is important to have a well thought-out medical emergency plan that all employees are familiar with.  OSHA Standard (29CFR1910.151) requires first aid supplies approved by a consulting physician be readily available.  The standard further requires that if an infirmary, hospital, or clinic is not in close proximity, at least one employee must be adequately trained to administer first aid.  (Red Cross training is acceptable to meet this requirement).  Evacuation routes should be reviewed, posted and practiced by all employees.  All exits must be clearly marked.  NOT AN EXIT must be posted over "false" exits.  Offices with more than fifty employees need at least two exits. 

Questions to think about:

         Do you know your route of escape in case of emergency?
         Have you practiced it?
         Where are the fire extinguishers on your floor?
         Do you know how to operate them?
         Where is your first aid kit?  Does it include a resuscitation mask?
         Have you been trained in CPR? 

Questions to Answer (Answers will be included in next month's newsletter)

1)     T/F  Respirators should only be used by individuals who are specially trained to use them. 

2)     T/F  To enter a permit-required confined space, you always need a special permit and you must be trained. 

3)     T/F  Machinery that is tagged out may only be used by supervisory personnel. 

4)     T/F  Employers are required by law to inform employees of the dangers associated with the chemicals they work with or may be exposed to. 

5)     T/F  Every industrial workplace must have an emergency action plan. 

6)     MSDS stands for_________ __________ __________ ___________. 

7)     A sign that says "CAUTION" means that

a)     there is a clear and present danger in the immediate area
b)     no untrained employees should proceed beyond that point
c)      there is a non-immediate hazard in the area
d)     there is a clear and present danger within 100 feet of that sign 

8)     Equipment is tagged when:

a)     it is broken or being serviced
b)     it is not performing up to standards
c)      its operation requires two or more people
d)     it is going to be replaced within six months 

9)     The dangers associated with permit-required confined spaces include:

a)     loneliness
b)     atmospheric hazards
c)      engulfment
d)     entrapment
e)     b, c, and d only 

10) Lockout and tag-out are:

a)     examples of labor actions
b)     wrestling terms
c)      ways to ensure that hazardous fumes do not enter a populated workspace
d)     ways to ensure that broken or out-of-service equipment remains safely out of use 

11) Hazardous wastes:

a)     are any hazardous material left over from a manufacturing process or other use
b)     must be treated, stored, and disposed of according to strict rules
c)      should be treated as if they were at least as dangerous as the original material
d)     all of the above

12) The most common work-related injury is:

a)     blindness
b)     hearing loss
c)      burns
d)     back injury 

Well folks, sorry I had to miss the convention this year, but I�ll try to be there next year.  I do hope that Mark Boberick is able to answer all those safety and health questions that you may have.  But if not, please feel free to contact me at your discretion. 

Regions Responsible for Providing New Chairs with New Consoles

One last note before I sign off, if your facility is due for the new consoles within the next few years, remember that we are also authorized new chairs with the new consoles.  It is up to your region to provide the chairs.  Here at GRB AFSS, we are testing a new ergonomic chair and may be receiving new ones in the future to test-sit.  Remember:  It is up to your facility to ensure this happens.

Back to Table of Contents


Sure, the North Pole Is Melting. So What?

S. Fred Singer, Courtesy of the Wall Street Journal

It is fashionable these days to blame almost everything on man-made global warming. So it comes as no great surprise to read in a recent New York Times story that "leads" of open water in ice fields near the North Pole filled cruise passengers on a Russian icebreaker with a "sense of alarm" about impending climate disasters. Two scientists who were lecturing aboard, a Harvard zoologist and an American Museum paleontologist (experts on animals and fossils, but not on meteorology), were "shocked," as ABC News reported, to find "Santa's workshop underwater."

I am a veteran of two Arctic expeditions with the U.S. Navy, and I can testify that ice- breakers always search for leads to make their way through the ice. After a long summer of 24-hour days it is not unusual to find open leads all over the place, especially af-ter strong winds break up the winter ice.

Nor is this a recent phenomenon. In a 1969 Dutch atlas the following passage appears: "The Northern Ice Sea is never completely frozen; 3- to 30-meter-thick ice floes con-tinue moving slowly around the pole. At the North Pole the winter temperature is never lower than -35 degrees Celsius. Summer temperatures can rise to 10 to 12 degrees Celsius." Those last temperatures are well above freezing.

But all this proves little about climate change or about enhanced greenhouse warming. For this purpose we use instruments: thermometers at weather stations, radiosondes carried into the atmosphere by weather balloons twice daily and, of course, Earth-circling weather satellites that sense atmospheric temperatures remotely. All of these agree that the polar regions have not warmed appreciably in recent decades.

Climate models do call for a warming trend as levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide rise because of the burning of fossil fuels. Hence the dilemma: Do we believe theoretical models of the atmosphere or the atmosphere itself? I prefer to believe in the atmosphere and the actual observations that show no current warming. If this clashes with the accepted popular wisdom and media hype, so be it. I go with published data.

The Earth did warm between about 1900 and 1940, with the climate recovering from a previous cold period that climate experts refer to as the Little Ice Age. As a result of these changes, which have nothing to do with human influences, it is warmer now than it was 100 years ago. This has had an influence on polar ice, which has been slowly thinning, as it melts from beneath. And the ice will continue to thin for some time to come even though the climate is no longer warming. Moral: It takes a lot of time to melt ice.

Weather satellites tell us that polar ice cover is shrinking -- likely a delayed effect of the pre-1940 warming. The Northeast Passage has opened up, allowing ships to sail from London to Japan along the coast of Siberia. It's all part of a natural climate cycle and need not cause concern. Recall that 1,000 years ago the climate was so warm that Vikings settled Greenland and grew crops there for a few centuries. Just imagine, Santa's reindeers would have had to swim to get here from the North Pole.

About the Author

Mr. Singer, former director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service and chief scientist at the Department of Transportation. He is also professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia.

Back to Table of Contents


TIPS FOR A SAFE & HAPPY HALLOWEEN

Remember...

1. When it appears that you have killed the monster, NEVER check to see if it's really dead.

2. Never read a book of demon summoning aloud, even just for kicks.

3. Do not search the basement, especially if the power has gone out.

4. If your children speak to you in Latin or any other language which they should not know, shoot them immediately. It will save you a lot of grief in the long run. However, it will probably take several rounds to kill them, so be prepared. This also applies to kids who speak with somebody else's voice.

5. When you have the benefit of numbers, NEVER pair off and go alone.

6. As a general rule, don't solve puzzles that open portals to Hell.

7. Never stand in, on, or above a grave, tomb, or crypt. This would apply to any other house of the dead as well.

8. If you're searching for something which caused a loud noise and find out that it's just the cat, GET OUT NOW!

9. If appliances start operating by themselves, do not check for short circuits, just get out.

10. Do not take ANYTHING from the dead.

11. If you find a town which looks deserted, there's probably a good reason for it. Don't stop and look around.

12. Don't fool with recombinant DNA technology unless you're absolutely sure you know what you're doing.

13. If you're running from the monster, expect to trip or fall down at least twice, more if you are of the female persuasion. Also note that despite the fact that you are running and the monster is merely shambling along, it's still moving fast enough to catch up with you.

14. If your companions suddenly begin to exhibit uncharacteristic behavior such as hissing, fascination for blood, glowing eyes, increasing hairiness, and so on, off them immediately. You'll thank yourself later.

15. Stay away from certain geographical locations, some of which are listed here: Amityville, Elm Street, Transylvania, Nilbog (you're already in trouble if you rec-ognize this one), anywhere in Texas where chainsaws are sold, the Bermuda Triangle, or any small town in Maine. Also, California and Ohio are good spots to avoid this and every other time of year. I mean, the answer's in the question.

16. If your car runs out of gas at night on a lonely road, do not go to the nearby de-serted-looking house to phone for help. If you think that it is strange you ran out of gas because you thought you had most of a tank, shoot yourself instead. You are going to die anyway and most likely be eaten.

17. Beware of strangers bearing strange tools. For example: chainsaws, nail guns, hedge trimmers, electric carving knives, combines, lawnmowers, butane torches, soldering irons, band saws or any devices made from deceased companions.

18. If you find that your house is built upon a cemetery, now is the time to move in with the in-laws. (It's a toss-up. We know.) This also applies to houses that had previous inhabitants who went mad, committed suicide, died in some horrible fashion, OR had inhabitants who performed satanic practices in your house.

19. (And perhaps the most important..) Always get out as soon as the scary music starts playing or an unknown, ghostly voice says, "GET OUT". Take the hint. It probably knows something you don't.

20. Have a HAPPY HALLOWEEN!! See you in San Diego.

Back to Table of Contents


Regional Supplements

 


EASTERN REGION


SOUTHERN REGION



NAATS Northwest Mountain

Back to Table of Contents


WESTERN-PACIFIC REGION


HENRY OLTMAN 

"We make $60,000 a year, and the job requires no heavy lifting." This was Henry's favorite saying to me when an employee was in trouble with the agency for something the employee really, really was at fault for. However, no matter whether the member brought the problem on themselves or was truly "wronged" by the agency, Henry was the up-front guy for them all. Myself and our regional FacReps depended on him for his ability to be able to present grievances at the regional level in a well thought through, constructive manner in order to have successful outcomes. He was always by my side, loyal, dutiful and dependable. I truly could not have asked for a 
better person. Our region voted him as the person I was to work with, and 
the members chose well. My thanks go to you, the Western-Pacific Region 
NAATS members, for giving me the few short years to enjoy working with such a talented, smart, positive person.that person quickly became my friend. 


Henry Oltman, Western-Pacific Regional Coordinator and member of the NAATS Public Relations Team, passed away October 13th from his bout with cancer. Those of us who knew Henry were blessed. If I had to sum up a description for those of you who only met him briefly or not at all, I would have to say that Henry was the type of person, who had the personality, humor and such a positive outlook on life, that if one couldn't get along with Henry, there would probably be nobody that individual could get along with. Henry brought life into a dull conversation. Henry found positive avenues to situations where it only seemed roads led to hopeless and negative destinations. Henry seemed to always be able to smile when everyone was down and needed to see a smile. 

Henry was a wonderful husband to his wife Diane, and they were able to travel together when he had business for the union, so we got to know Diane as well. She is as strong and positive a person as Henry was. We will miss Henry but we will always have his memories, and Diane will always be a part of our union family.

"$60,000 a year, and no heavy lifting....."


Best Regards, Henry,


Ward 

Back to Table of Contents


MAIN INDEX INFORMATION CONSTITUTION PRESS RELEASES
RECENT UPDATES NEWSLETTERS CONTRACT POLITICS
RENAISSANCE NEWS ARTICLES FACREP HELPS HUMOR
MY NOTES LETTERS to MEMBERS LINKS NATIONAL/REGIONAL REPS
 
11303 Amherst Avenue, Suite 4,  Wheaton, MD  20902
(301) 933-6228  ---  933-3902 fax
www.naats.org
Walter W. Pike, President
Copyright � 2000; NAATS, All Rights Reserved.
Please send any comments, problems or questions regarding this site to John Dibble.

This page was last updated on 29 October, 2000

  1. pintarbersamamedan.org
  2. https://pintarbersamamanado.org
  3. https://pintarbersamasorong.org/dana
  4. TOGEL HONGKONG
  5. DATA SGP
  6. TOGEL SIDNEY
  7. DATA SGP
  8. TOGEL HK
  9. pengeluaran sdy
  10. TOGEL SIDNEY
  11. TOGEL HONGKONG
  12. DATA HK
  13. TOGEL
  14. https://elk-mountain.com/
  15. togel sdy
  16. HK LOTTO
  17. TOGEL SGP
  18. togel hongkong
  19. togel hongkong
  20. togel hongkong
  21. togel hongkong
  22. togel hongkong
  23. KELUARAN HK