No. 16, May 17, 1999

Thank you for your patience and support. I know everyone is concerned about all the issues we�re facing. I�ll do my best to keep you updated in a timely manner.

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS

Last week we concluded our latest bargaining session with the management team. Although it was productive (19 tentative articles signed) it was disappointing to our team that we didn�t get more issues addressed. With over forty (40) proposed articles left to be negotiated it�s clear to us that we�ll have to pick up the pace in order to finish during our July meeting. There is no agreement to meet past that time.

One item that we did get resolved was the new FAM article. We signed an MOU last week that reflects that FAA�s agreement with NATCA on this and we�re mailing it to all FacReps today.

PAY/COMPENSATION

As of today, the Pay/Comp subgroup is still stuck in neutral. It seems that ALR decided the Administrator needed to be briefed before we moved any further along and they unilaterally halted all progress until this occurred. Supposedly they briefed Ms. Garvey last Friday and we will be back to work shortly. Please check Don McLennan�s pay bulletins for more information and contact him with any concerns or suggestions.

NATCA/PASS

Last Friday I attended the NATCA BOD meeting to discuss how our unions might work together on common matters. It was a good meeting and I plan to attend the PASS BOD meeting later this month for the same purpose. Current plans call for the NATCA and PASS presidents to attend our BOD meeting in June.

LEGISLATIVE

We�ve contacted every member of the Aviation Subcommittee to stress our twin concerns of staffing and equipment (OASIS). We hope to see the results of that work during the next 45 days.

No. 17, May 19, 1999

NEW PAY PLAN

I received a call the day this week from the FAA Labor Relations Representative. He told me the Agency feeling was that the Pay/Compensation Sub Group had completed its work and there was concern about the product that had been developed. Specifically, I was told that the work so far indicated a "raise" and that there wasn�t any money available for a raise without the corresponding offsets. He went on to say that the pay talks should now be included in the work rules negotiations and addressed at the end. In response to my questions he assured me that the necessary support, including subject matter experts, would be included on the Agency team. I made the observation that it was premature to conclude that the pay/comp sub group had arrived at a raise since we haven�t yet started the process of costing out any articles or discussing the dollars. I made no commitment during the call and I said I would get back with our answer. I did indicate that their proposed process represented a considerable change from our previous agreement with Air Traffic and that this alone was a cause for concern.

We will be considering all of the ramifications of this proposal during our Board of Director�s meeting the week of June 7. We will also consider all options available to us. Please rest assured that we are determined to negotiate the best available pay plan for your consideration, however, no one can make any promises on the final agreement. I can say that we are insisting on fairness. The FAA/NATCA pay plan is a good agreement and we congratulate them. Now it�s our turn.

We�ll keep you informed. 

No. 18, June 12, 1999

Last week, at the Board of Directors meeting, we decided to withdraw all participation from the NAATS/FAA Partnership. This decision was not taken lightly but only after much discussion and consideration of the potential consequences. In the end the withdrawal was supported unanimously by the Board.

The reasons for this action are significant. As I mentioned in my last update to you, the FAA Labor Relations representative contacted me and told me that the Agency wanted, in effect, to discard two years worth of collaborative effort in determining reclassification for our bargaining unit. It seems that they had unilaterally made a determination that the work of the compensation and costing sub group required a pay raise for our members and was inconsistent with the Agency "core" plan. That's an amazing conclusion to draw considering we even haven't started the dollar discussions yet.

Nevertheless, the FAA now chooses to renege on previous understandings and to insist that pay negotiations be addressed at the conclusion of the work rules negotiation. Further, they state that we're currently overpaid and they base this assumption on a market study that both parties have previously agreed was flawed and must be discarded. All of this was determined without any discussion with me or any of our other representatives. Since I've haven't talked with the Administrator I can only assume that she has received extremely poor advice.

Obviously, management's credibility is near zero with us now. Partnership requires mutual respect and a degree of trust. If we can't trust them to keep their agreements on the single most important issue to our members (pay) how can we deal with them on the day to day issues? They appear to have mistaken our willingness to work collaboratively as a weakness. That's a serious miscalculation on their part.

The fact is that the FAA must negotiate pay/compensation with us. If traditional bargaining is all they understand and respect then we're fully prepared to use all options at our disposal to achieve fair treatment for our members.

Meantime, effective immediately, no NFP activity is authorized at any level. Officially the program no longer exists. Agreements reached in NFP remain in effect but those awaiting final disposition are now to be negotiated traditionally. I've asked LR Director Mike Doring to prepare guidance and forms for use by our FacReps on these issues and he will have it distributed this week.

We know that this decision will not be universally popular within our membership. To those of you who have been supportive and worked for NFP over the years, we thank you for your efforts and we hope you will understand the need for this action. As one who has been a strong proponent of partnership I certainly feel it's regrettable that this has become necessary. I do not know when or if NFP will be re-instituted; that ball is in the FAA's court now. Other strong actions are being contemplated; if management continues along this negative path we will react accordingly. I've called and left a message for Jane Garvey that I'm available to meet and discuss the pay issue.

At this time we intend to meet with the management team in July and conclude the work rules part of the negotiations. No further meetings are scheduled. Of course you will be the final judge of both the work rules and compensation packages through the ratification process.

As details become available we'll keep you informed. Your patience and support during this difficult time are appreciated. If you have any questions please contact your Regional Director or me.

No. 19, July 1, 1999

This week I met with the attorney representing the FAA on pay negotiations in an attempt to resolve the issues that led to our NFP withdrawal. I believe we may be close to a resolution but nothing firm yet. It is important to note that none of these discussions address the dollar issue on our compensation; that will be negotiated by teams representing the FAA and NAATS at a later time. We�re merely trying to reach agreement on how to address those issues.

We�re not the only FAA union experiencing difficulty in negotiating with the FAA. Our brothers and sisters in PASS are now at impasse over AF compensation issues. PASS President Mike Fanfalone and I are staying in close touch and we�ve agreed to support each other.

I am also working closely with AT-1 Ron Morgan on the many other issues facing us. That relationship remains positive and productive.

I�ve been made aware of Model Work Environment (MWE) problems, especially in our Southern and Southwest regions. I was at a CMD Civil Rights meeting last week and I believe the MWE process has been misrepresented in these regions. In my opinion MWE merely means treating each other with respect and making the workplace more productive. Apparently there are those who have agendas that distort MWE for their own purposes. To help address this problem I�ve asked NAATS Southern Regional Director Craig Campbell to be our representative on a future workgroup that will more clearly define the roles and responsibilities of employees.

One of my goals is to make us more effective in gaining support for our issues from our congressional representatives on Capitol Hill. Recently we enjoyed a great success in getting the ninety (90) new hire positions restored in the House subcommittee. Of course we�re not out of the woods yet, the restoration still has to survive the final House/Senate markup but we remain cautiously optimistic. Like it or not, that�s the way business is done here and effective congressional lobbying is essential for our survival.

More details as they develop. Happy July 4 to all.

Wally Pike

No. 20, July 22, 1999

Contract Negotiations

It wasn't easy but we now have 120 articles tentatively agreed upon (TAU) with 11 at impasse. The management team has chosen to publicly identify these articles for their constituency so we are doing the same for you. Listed below are the articles in agreement:

  • Parties to the Agreement

  • Purpose and Objectives of the Agreement

  • Union Recognition

  • Employer Rights

  • Seniority

  • Copies of the Agreement

  • Child Care

  • Dues Withholding

  • Record of Meetings and Communications

  • Recruiting Members

  • Joint Union/Management Meetings

  • Union Publications

  • PWB Evaluation Recording

  • Smoking Policy

  • Employer Publications

  • Parking

  • Calendar Days

  • Dress Code

  • Special Events and Mutual Reassignments

  • Search and Rescue (SAR) Activity

  • Memorandum of Agreement on "covered by" Issues

  • Annual Leave

  • Union Representation and Official Time for Representational Duties

  • Work Groups, Committees, Program and Project Representatives

  • Use of Official Government Telephone Lines

  • Use of Employer Provided Facilities, Publications, & Services

  • MOA on Implementation of Travel Policy

  • Academy Representation

  • Surveys and Questionnaires

  • Discipline and Adverse Actions

  • National Transportation Safety Boards (NTSB) Union Representatives

  • Fare Subsidies

  • Accommodation of Disabled Employees

  • Priority Consideration

  • Disabled Veterans Affirmative Action Program

  • Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)

  • Excused Absences

  • Leave Without Pay for Union Officials

  • Flexible Spending Accounts/Gain Sharing

  • Applicable Regulations

  • Controller Performance

  • Security

  • Leave for Special Circumstances

  • Sick Leave

  • Union Board of Directors, National and Regional Meetings

  • Names of Employees and Communications

  • Prenatal/Infant Care

  • Employee Rights and Obligations

  • Retirement and Benefits Administration

  • Privileged Communications

  • Official Government Business

  • Wellness Centers and Physical Fitness Programs

  • Operational Error/Deviation Investigation, Reporting and Review

  • Assignment of Temporarily Disabled Employees

  • Critical Incident Stress Management

  • Traffic Management Program (TMP)

  • Facility Closing and Part Timings

  • Regional Quarterly Meetings

  • Enroute Flight Advisory Service (EFAS) Training

  • Leave Transfer

  • Reduction in Force (RIF)

  • Working Hours

  • Watch Schedules

  • Employee Recertification

  • Facility of Preference

  • Position Descriptions

  • Official Record

  • Liaison and Familiarization Training

  • Facility Evaluations

  • Equipment Placement

  • National Pay Procedures

  • Contracting Out/Enhancing, Altering and/or Reassigning Functions

  • Effect of the Agreement

  • Duration

  • Reopener

  • Ground Rules

  • Immunity Program

  • Hiring Criteria

  • Return Rights from Overseas Locations

  • Details and Temporary Promotions

  • Training and Career Development

  • Part-Time Employment

  • Flight Service Option Career Strategies

  • Representation Rights

  • Career Transition

  • Hazardous Duty Pay

  • Grievance Procedures

  • Studies of Employees and Their Working Conditions

  • Promotions

  • Injury Compensation

  • Human Factors

  • Mid-Term Negotiations

  • Alternative Work Schedules

  • Overtime

  • Jury Duty and Court Leave

  • NFP MOU

  • Learning Councils

  • On-The-Job Training (1 section impassed premium pay)

  • Facility Expansion

  • Technological/Procedural Changes

  • Cultural Diversity

  • FAA Policies and Directives

  • Controller-in-Charge Duties (1 section impassed - premium pay)

  • Performance/Incentive Awards

  • Compensation

  • Within Grade Increases

  • Severance Pay

  • Changes to Personnel Policies, Practices and Working Conditions

  • Official Travel and Relocation

  • Temporary Assignments

  • OSHA

  • Employee Assistance Program

  • Agency Abstinence Requirements

  • Self Referral

  • Substance Testing

  • Staffing

  • Bargaining Unit Placement Program (BUPP)

  • Hazardous Geological Conditions

  • Wages

  • Sick Leave Buyback (FERS)

  • The following articles are at impasse and will be addressed with the assistance of a mediator from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS).

  • Nondiscrimination

  • Holidays

  • Medical Exams

  • Travel and Per Diem for FMCS Meetings

  • Travel and Per Diem for FSIP Meetings

  • Compensatory Time in Lieu of Overtime/Holiday/Day-in-Lieu of Holiday

  • Premium Pay Section of OJT

  • Premium Pay Section of CIC

  • Performance Appraisal

  • One article, Personnel Reform Implementations, has initially been declared non-negotiable. We will request a written declaration from the FAA and pursue this through the Federal Labor Relations Authority.

    We now have agreement to begin negotiations on the new compensation system, perhaps as early as next month. One of the advantages of having such a large negotiations team is that we can now split into two separate units to address the compensation negotiations and the remainder of the impasse articles.

    The following articles are identified for the Compensation Negotiations:

  • NAATS Classification and Compensation

  • Reinventing Government

  • Bargaining Unit Staffing

  • Sick Leave Buyback (CSRS)

  • The John F. Kennedy, Jr. tragedy occurred during our negotiations in San Diego. I was interviewed by the ABC and CBS affiliates to discuss the services we provide. My thanks to WP Regional Director Ward Simpson for his help in coordinating events. We expect to be contacted by other media sources as the accident story unfolds.

    NAATS NE Regional Director Kurt Comisky and I have maintained contact during this time and he has been on top of the situation at BDR AFSS. As you may know there was a Boston Globe article concerning one of our controllers at BDR. I'm happy to report that this matter has been fully resolved and the controller has been exonerated by the FAA of any wrongdoing. Kurt advises that no further action is necessary from us and that AOPA has been very helpful on this matter. EA Regional Director Ron Maisel has also been working with ISP FacRep George Fonos and they're investigating any possible contacts with the aircraft that evening. MIV AFSS FacRep Ron Consalvo has informed us that there were no contacts at his station.

    NAATS Webmaster John Dibble has published a press release and NAATS PR Chairman Larry Burdick is contacting the various periodicals with this information. Our NAATS Headquarters liaisons are in contact with their agency counterparts to ensure that our message is heard there.

    I've also tasked our congressional representative Hal Gross with ensuring that Capitol Hill fully understands the services we provide and our staffing and equipment concerns. Through all this we've taken care not to appear to be "ambulance chasing" and we're taking the high road while still be informative about our mission.

    We expect there will be ramifications of this crash for the next several months and that we will have opportunities to further our message in a number of forums.

    Wally Pike

    No. 21, August 4, 1999

    PAY NEGOTIATIONS

    The compensation plan bargaining will begin sometime in October. The reason for the delay is the fact that the FAA team can�t identify a one-week period to meet with us until then because of prior commitments. Naturally we�d like to get started earlier but it�s not essential. We have a signed agreement with the FAA that states that any pay adjustment agreed to by the parties will be made effective retroactive to the first pay period beginning on or after October 1, 1999. This is in addition to the government-wide increases. While the negotiations are taking place, current pay procedures will remain in effect, including the government-wide increases and the 5% ATRA.

    Obviously the compensation negotiations are the key issue for us. We�re determined to get a fair agreement for our bargaining unit and we�ll use all the resources available to secure it. Your continued support, patience and cooperation are appreciated.

    NFP

    The Board of Directors has analyzed our situation and decided that a return to the NAATS/FAA Partnership (NFP) is not warranted at this time. At the conclusion of compensation negotiations the matter will be reviewed again. If you have any questions or comments, I encourage you to contact your Regional Director.

    FACILITY VISIT

    SO Regional Director Craig Campbell and I will be at MIA AFSS on Thursday, August 19 to meet with the membership. One of my regrets is that I haven�t been able to attend these types of meeting during the past few months. In fact, we were in San Diego for two weeks last month negotiating the new contract and we never had the chance to visit the membership or AFSS there. I�m really looking forward to this opportunity. My thanks to FacRep Tom Forte for his invitation.

    MWE

    We�re continuing to receive disturbing reports about the misapplication of Model Work Environment (MWE). Craig Campbell has been appointed as our representative to a future workgroup that will address MWE; please send your concerns and suggestions on this to him. A reminder, Assistant Administrator for Civil Rights (ACR-1) Fanny Rivera will be speaking on MWE at our national meeting in October. This is an excellent opportunity to discuss this issue with the most knowledgeable person in the FAA.

    CONGRESSIONAL

    NAATS Congressional Representative Hal Gross is working with NE Regional Director Kurt Comisky to formulate our testimony before the Aviation Subcommittee Hearing on adverse weather. We�ll finalize and submit this testimony to the House on Monday and post it on our web page.

    Wally Pike

    No. 22, August 24, 1999

    We now have an agreement with the FAA that will allow us to discuss the 120 tentatively agreed upon articles with you at our October national meeting in Las Vegas. Next week I will forward the TAUs to the Regional Coordinators for distribution at your facilities. Please review them and compile a list of your questions or comments for discussion on October 7. In response to several suggestions received at our meeting last year, we will publish the national meeting agenda in the next edition of NAATS News.

    We do not have a firm agreement on exactly when we will begin compensation negotiations in October but my best guess is that it will be the week of October 25. This will allow us to hear and incorporate your comments and suggestions when we discuss this at the national meeting.

    On Monday, August 23 I met with Ron Morgan, AAT-1, to discuss the familiarization training program and questions concerning its application. We are close to an agreement on 76 questions and answers relating to the program as well as a joint cover letter. We hope to have this distributed to the facilities in the next week or so. I know it has been confusing; your patience is appreciated.

    I met with an important congressional staffer named Wally Burnett this week. Burnett will negotiate the senate side of the pay and staffing issues during the senate/house conference on aviation in September. Obviously he�s a key player for us. The topic was OASIS funding; the senate has a mark of $10M for the program while the house is at $42.1M. I think the meeting went well. I told him that I was sure we would be talking more in the future. I�m convinced that we have to get more political with our issues.

    On August 19 SO Regional Director Craig Campbell and I attended a NAATS union meeting in Miami. There were approximately 50 members there from six stations and the meeting provided excellent dialogue on several issues. The next day I toured MIA AIFSS and saw firsthand their workload. I want to thank MIA FacRep Tom Forte for all his work in making arrangements, thanks to those who took the time and effort to attend and to Steve and Denise Jones for hosting the union meeting. I don�t get many opportunities to attend these meetings and I thoroughly enjoyed this one.

    Wally Pike

    No. 23, September 15 1999

    We have an agreement with the FAA to apply the January pay comparability increase to members of our bargaining unit. Negotiations on the new compensation plan will begin the week of October 25.

    Our staffing numbers as of 8/31/99: 2,183 FPLs and 68 developmentals for a total of 2,251. Total number in the other than controller workforce (OTCWF) 3,021. One of the issues we�re going to address in compensation negotiations is a staffing figure for FSS controllers that does not include staff and administrative employees. It will strictly reflect the number of employees actually providing the service (briefing pilots). Once that number is established the FAA will have to maintain it by hiring when attrition warrants.

    We are continuing to address the matter of union representation at EEO complaints. We�re in a variety of forums with this: we have contract proposals, an agenda item for the National Partnership Council meeting in November as well as negotiations on the new mediation order. Since we don�t have agreement with the FAA yet we can�t allow the new mediation process to apply to our bargaining unit members. Once we reach agreement the mediation order will be applicable to members in our unit.

    I�ve just been notified that Deputy Associate Administrator for Air Traffic Services Steve Brown will be at our national meeting to speak about his vision of the future of Flight Service and to take your questions. Steve has been with the FAA for about a year and comes from AOPA so he�s very knowledgeable about general aviation issues. As he�s told me he feels he grew up using Flight Service so we�re very happy he can make our meeting.

    The FacRep official time entitlements for the Las Vegas meeting are confirmed. If you have any questions or problems in getting your official time please contact your regional officers.

    October will be an extremely busy month for us. Our national meeting is the first week, and then we will attend the NBAA convention in Atlanta. The AOPA convention is the third week and our pay negotiations are the fourth. Of course we have our usual Capitol Hill meetings to make and the administrative meetings with the FAA. We�ll keep you advised.

    Linda Whitaker from the EA Region (MIV AFSS) has been representing us on the ATS Facility Accessibility Workgroup. We�ve been informed that Linda has been selected to receive the 1999 Airway Facilities National Honorary Award for Excellence. She has also been nominated in the Against All Odds/Non-Technical; Model Work Environment/Non-Supervisory Team Achievement/Technical and 20/20 Foresight category for the 1999 Airway Facilities National Honorary Awards for Excellence Program. Good work, Linda.

    Wally Pike

    No. 24, September 20, 1999

    As we get closer to the start of compensation negotiations it�s important that everyone understand the bargaining process. In pay negotiations in the private sector the union always has the right to withhold services (strike) if agreement isn�t reached with management. Obviously we�re precluded by law from striking so that isn�t an option.

      In some public sector pay negotiations (postal employees) an impasse over pay would be heard by an arbitrator who would impose a binding settlement. Unfortunately that isn�t the case for us either. When Congress restored our bargaining rights after personnel reform three years ago they put in place a procedure that doesn�t resemble any semblance of an even playing field.

      Basically it amounts to this; if an impasse occurs we would first use the services of a mediator from the FMCS. This mediator would attempt to structure an agreement between NAATS and FAA management but they would have no authority to impose a settlement. If the impasse is still in place after the use of the mediator then the procedure calls for the FAA Administrator to send the FAA�s position along with the union�s objections to Congress. If Congress doesn�t act within 60 days then the FAA�s position is adopted.

      The procedure does not identify who in Congress would receive the dispute. No one that we�ve talked to in Congress feels that they could or would act within 60 days of the receipt of the FAA�s notice of impasse. Simply stated, the procedure is slanted in management�s favor regarding any personnel reform negotiation impasses. This procedure doesn�t just apply to NAATS; it�s the same for all the FAA unions.

      We�re working with the other unions to correct this imbalance. Although we feel we�ll eventually succeed, no one knows the timetable for success.

      Please understand this does not mean we don�t have some cards to play in the compensation negotiations; we have resources and we won�t hesitate to use them to obtain a fair agreement. One avenue is political. In that regard Congressional Representative Hal Gross and I have been to three fundraisers this week alone, lining up support in case it is needed.  

    We are insisting on fairness by FAA management and a demonstration of how they value us as employees. We have no plans to alter our direction but it is important that all members understand the rules of the game we�re in.

      In closing, FAA management has repeatedly stated that they don�t feel they�ll have to send negotiation impasses to Congress.  

                            Wally Pike

    No. 25, October 20, 1999

    Compensation negotiations will begin next Monday. I’ll keep you informed of our progress.

    The national meeting in Las Vegas last week seems to have been a success. We are slowly receiving the membership vouchers with their comments and we’ll be using revising future meetings accordingly.

    One of my regrets was that we didn’t have enough time to adequately discuss the 120 TAUs. In order to avoid unnecessary duplication AK Regional Coordinator Tracey Tideswell has volunteered to collect all questions and we’ll promptly put the answers in the NAATS News and on the web page. You can contact Tracey at (907) 283-8126. Her mailing address is P.O. Box 1769, Kenai, AK 99611; email [email protected].

    I would have liked an opportunity to discuss any concerns on the TAUs face-to-face. One question I’ve heard involves the use of the words "will" and "shall". For our purposes these words are interchangeable; both imply that the instant action is mandatory. The different definitions used in air traffic control phraseology do not apply to the labor relations definitions.

    One issue we discussed at the BOD meeting is the various seniority petitions being circulated. The feeling is that it is premature to act on these until a majority of the membership has made its wishes known. If a majority of the membership requests a national determination on seniority we will be happy to accommodate.

    I am again requesting volunteers for either short or long term details as national union representatives on work groups or committees. These meetings are usually held in the Washington, D.C. area. If you are interested in this type of work please forward your name and area of interest to me when you can.

    Wally Pike

    No. 26, October 30, 1999

    COMPENSATION NEGOTIATIONS

    We met with the management team this past week on both the few remaining work rule articles and, of course, compensation. We reached agreement on two of the work rule articles, Performance and Reinventing Government. These are available from your FacRep. 

    We also made our proposal for the new multi-tiered compensation plan for our bargaining unit as developed by the pay/compensation sub work group. The management team will make their counter proposal when we next meet the week of January 10. Both teams agreed that, although there may be boundaries that neither team will cross, nothing is off the table for discussion.  

    While it would have been nice to reach immediate agreement on all issues, no one could have reasonably expected that on either team. We made progress and we feel cautiously optimistic about the future negotiations.

    OASIS

    As you may know the latest FAA budget contains only $10 million for OASIS. This is $17.3 million dollars short of the amount necessary to field the system with the human factors issues addressed. This was an item I discussed this with AOPA President Phil Boyer at their convention in Atlantic City.  On Thursday morning I met with Administrator Garvey and we discussed possible reprogramming the necessary funding. It was agreed that I will work with APU-1 Brian Riley to try to find the funds

    FAMILIARIZATION TRAINING

    Yesterday I met with AT-1 Ron Morgan regarding the questions and answers to the new FAM training program. We reached agreement and these should be distributed to the field shortly.

     I�ll keep you advised of developments as they occur. - Wally Pike

    No. 27, November 12, 1999

    As I mentioned in my last update, I�m cautiously optimistic about our compensation negotiations. The management team states that they want a quick, non-adversarial agreement. The important thing to remember is that while we�re in negotiations all pay status will stay the same for our bargaining unit, including the 5% ATRA. We also have an agreement to make the new pay plan retroactive to October of 1999.

    At the National Partnership Council meeting last week we decided that the Council should work Model Work Environment. We chartered a sub group and our representative is Southern Regional Director Craig Campbell. If you have any thoughts or comments about MWE please contact Craig.

    During the month of October I was at NAATS Headquarters just two days. November doesn�t look much better. To the extent feasible please contact your regional representatives with questions or comments; otherwise I�ll get back to you when I can.

    We�re continuing to work with the FAA, congress and AOPA on the OASIS budget shortfall. I met with FAA Budget Director (ABU-1) Brian Riley on Wednesday and we discussed possible reprogramming of funds from other programs. It won�t be easy since at least five critical programs have received reduced funding but we did agree to meet again between Thanksgiving and Christmas when we will have a better idea of all the budgetary impacts. Even if funds can be identified we don�t expect them to be available until next spring. This will force some hard decisions about OASIS deployment and the waterfall. Although Congress agrees with us that OASIS is a critical system, they have declined to issue a supplemental appropriation for the program but they have indicated they won�t oppose reprogramming. I�ve discussed this on a number of occasions with AOPA President Phil Boyer and we�re working to devise a coordinated approach, including having an AOPA presence at the next meeting with ABU-1. I also intend to continue to meet with the Administrator to stress our case for priority.

    Of course, the continuing area of concern is our staffing. We have a congressional mandate of 3,000 in the other than controller work force (OTCWF) but Air Traffic is concerned about the overall funding for operations. I�ve discussed this with both AT-1 Ron Morgan and ATS-1 Steve Brown but with no resolution. I�ll next meet with the Deputy Administrator Monte Belger to try to resolve any discrepancy on new hires and a hiring pipeline. A hard staffing figure of pilot weather briefers (excluding people on details, staff, management, administrative) is also a compensation negotiations goal.

    Several of you have no doubt seen the latest memorandum from the White House on E.O. 12871. We will be discussing the implementation of this memo at the DOT Partnership meeting on November 17.

    Wally Pike

    No. 28, November 22, 1999

    Last week ATP sponsored the "General Aviation Summit" in Washington, D.C. The meeting began on Monday and ended Friday. The theme for the meeting was the renaissance of Flight Service. Participants were the user groups; AOPA, NBAA, GAMA, SAMA, EAA, the 99�s, our Board of Directors and various levels of FAA management.

    The results of this meeting were revolutionary for our option. Among the unanimous recommendations:

    • Overhaul the entire NOTAM system,

    • Replace DF with Aircraft Situational Displays at all FSSs,

    • Allow FSS to provide real time SUA information,

    • Spend the briefing time on the most important items, de-emphasize legal requirements that hamper communications,

    • Do not permit off-loading to another facility when a pilot calls a specific facility location on the ground or inflight,

    • Provide FSS controllers with aircraft "tags", including briefing history,

    • Revise present policies to provide FSS controllers with training and certification for forecasts and nowcasts,

    • Provide a shared database between all FAA facilities,

    • Replace WMSCR lines to improve data communication rates, 

    • Provide operational weather graphics that show current and forecast weather hazard areas for instrument conditions, thunderstorms, icing and turbulence. Ensure these are highly accurate, precise and timely,

    • Fully fund the FAA aviation weather research program,

    • Improve number and quality of PIREPs by educating pilots on the need and best practice methods of reporting.

    The combined summit participants briefed these recommendations, as well as several others, to AT-1. It was stressed that these are unanimous recommendations and implementation is expected and will be closely monitored. An Interim Review Group (IRG) will be formed with representatives of management, user groups and NAATS to ensure implementation. In May of 2000 another meeting will be held by the participants to review progress.

    Obviously, there�s a lot of work ahead of us to accomplish these goals but this is the first time in my experience that we�ve had industry supporting our efforts. Just as obviously, the FAA will have to change the way they look at our option and the services we can and should provide. So be it. We�re very encouraged by what we accomplished last week and we�re determined to maintain the momentum.

    PRT Chairman Larry Burdick is preparing a press release. I will stay in close touch with both industry leaders and FAA management as we proceed and I�ll keep you advised.

    Happy Thanksgiving to all,

      Wally Pike

    No. 29, December 3, 1999

    MEETINGS

    The Board of Directors met this week in Washington, D.C. It was decided that we would continue to make the OASIS and staffing issues our highest priority along with compensation negotiations.  We also allocated additional funds for arbitration and there will be an increased emphasis on training. If you want more details on this meeting please contact your Regional Director.

    Please note that the date for the national membership meeting in CY2000 was set. It will be on November 15-16 with an additional Facrep training class on November 14. The location is Orlando, Florida.

    I have meetings scheduled this month with Steve Brown, acting ATS-1, to discuss how the FAA will fund the additional 90 FSS controllers incorporated into the congressional language. One concern is the training ability at the Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City. It appears that the FAA has allowed the instructor staff to attrite to the point where they can't train all the students without conducting night classes. There's an additional $600,000 cost that must be reconciled.

    I have a meeting with Administrator Garvey to continue our discussion on the possible re-programming of funds to OASIS. At this time we have $11.5M assigned to OASIS and our original request was $27.3M. I'm also continuing to work with the FAA Budget Director Brian Riley on the same subject. AOPA has been very helpful in this matter. Our national OASIS Representative Jeff Barnes will have a more detailed report on this in the next NAATS News.

    Additionally, I'm now involved in the Safer Skies work group initiative of the Administrator. Previously, NAATS ARS Liaison Dan Petlowany was our sole representative to this group but after the General Aviation Summit a few weeks ago it was recommended that I should join Dan to help further general aviation goals. The next meeting is next week. Another meeting of the General Aviation Summit Pilot Weather Briefing sub group is tentatively scheduled for the first week of January, with the full group meeting in February.

    Pay negotiations resume the week of January 10. We expect the Agency's initial pay proposal at this meeting.

    We are continuing to attend the necessary congressional fundraisers to press our issues politically. A supplemental authorization for the FAA in the operations area is possible.

    DETAILS/WORK GROUPS

    A reminder -- if you are interested in serving as a NAATS representative on either a detail to FAA HQ or on a work group please send us your name. It would be helpful if you would indicate your area of interest (labor relations, automation, operations, etc) and whether you want consideration for a one-year detail or to a work group. We anticipate selecting representatives to a number of these in the near future.

      Wally Pike

    No. 30, January 14, 2000

    Pay Negotiations

    We met with the management team the week of January 10. There was considerable discussion about the Parties' positions and the justifications for it. Basically you can sum it up by saying they want us in the core plan with any pay increases identified by corresponding offsets. Our proposal is that reclassification is more consistent with the Agency goal that employees should be paid for the actual work they perform with commensurate salary increases. We will next meet the week of March 13; the NAATS team remains firm in our conviction that we will get a fair agreement for your consideration and ratification.

    Note - by now you no doubt have heard that PASS reached agreement with FAA management on their AF pay impasse. I haven't had the opportunity to talk with PASS President Mike Fanfalone but I have heard some of the details of their agreement. Following is what I understand their agreement to be subject to membership ratification: 

    • The agreement is consistent with the FAA core plan,

    • 5% ATRA is rolled into base pay @ 4.1%,

    • The PASS/AF OSI is guaranteed as a minimum equal to the general increase for all Federal employees or the FAA OSI whichever is greater,

    • 5.5% increase in pay over 5 years, which breaks down as follows:

      1. Year 1 = 0

      2. Year 2 = .5%

      3. Year 3 = .5%

      4. Year 4 = 1.5%

      5. Year 5 = 3%

    • Non-technical (admin) will receive a $500 payment but not the 5.5% increase.

      OASIS

    As has been the case lately, it's a mixed bag on the OASIS front.

    The FAA successfully appealed the $10M budget for FY01. The new figure is $23M but there is still concern about the implementation schedule. OASIS Representative Jeff Barnes and I met with ARA-1 Steve Zaidman and several of the program people just after Christmas and we discussed how best to proceed with the program. It is essential that the Human Factors Team be free to concentrate on determining what the final OASIS product will look like and that they not be concerned about political considerations. While the HF Team will determine the final product that is deployed, there will probably be some difficult political decisions that have to be made. The responsibility for those decisions belongs to me, not the Human Factors Team.

    Wally Pike

    1. pintarbersamamedan.org
    2. https://pintarbersamamanado.org
    3. https://pintarbersamasorong.org/dana
    4. TOGEL HONGKONG
    5. DATA SGP
    6. TOGEL SIDNEY
    7. DATA SGP
    8. TOGEL HK
    9. pengeluaran sdy
    10. TOGEL SIDNEY
    11. TOGEL HONGKONG
    12. DATA HK
    13. TOGEL
    14. https://elk-mountain.com/
    15. togel sdy
    16. HK LOTTO
    17. TOGEL SGP
    18. togel hongkong
    19. togel hongkong
    20. togel hongkong
    21. togel hongkong
    22. togel hongkong
    23. KELUARAN HK
    24. TOGEL
    25. PENGELUARAN SGP
    26. TOGEL HK
    27. KELUARAN HK
    28. TOTO SGP
    29. TOGEL HONGKONG
    30. PENGELUARAN HK
    31. HK PRIZE
    32. KELUARAN HK
    33. TOGEL HARI INI
    34. HK POOLS
    35. KELUARAN HK
    36. SLOT QRIS
    37. HK Lotto
    38. RESULT HK
    39. LIVE SDY
    40. live draw sdy